Welcome to Startups Weekly, a contemporary human-first tackle this week’s startup information and developments. To get this in your inbox, subscribe right here.
There’s a conflict occurring within the early-stage market.
In a single world, late-stage buyers are reacting to tech stonk corrections by clamoring towards the early-stage funding world, forcing seed buyers to go even earlier to defend possession and potential returns. This pattern was underscored by corporations like Andreessen Horowitz launching a pre-seed program months after launching a $400 million seed fund. Much more, Techstars, an accelerator actually launched to assist startups get off the bottom, debuted a fund to again corporations which are too early for its conventional programming.
Whereas all that is occurring, early-stage buyers are enduring a valuation correction and portfolio markdowns. Some are admitting that they’re telling portfolio corporations to refocus on money conservation, profitability and self-discipline, not simply progress.
Let’s faux these two vastly totally different worlds are in the identical universe: Early-stage buyers are getting extra disciplined and money wealthy, however on the identical time, the earliest buyers are going earlier. Buyers are pushing founders to be lean but in addition inexperienced, however on the identical time, providing them $10,000 to take PTO for every week and check out their hand at entrepreneurship. Progress, gross margin and burn are the new top priorities for CEOs, however on the identical time, enterprise capitalists are clamoring to supply extra funds, earlier, in newly invented subcategories of early-stage funding.
It’s so much occurring directly, and makes me fear concerning the race to the underside — or race to the earliest stage — and its penalties. For extra ideas, learn my Avisionews+ piece: “If the earliest buyers preserve going earlier, what’s going to occur?”
On this e-newsletter, we’ll discuss information that has to do with Elon Musk, and information that has nothing to do with Elon Musk. As at all times, you may help me by forwarding this article to a buddy, following me on Twitter or subscribing to my personal blog.
Let’s discuss Elon Musk
As I’m certain a lot of you realize all too properly, Elon Musk’s $44 billion greenback bid for Twitter was accepted this week, marking an enormous second in tech historical past and a looming return to the personal markets for a elementary social media platform. We wrote up your entire timeline of Musk’s acquisition, from tweet to shut, however simply know the saga is nowhere close to finished — the deal is but to formally shut.
Right here’s why it’s essential: I imply, for as soon as this format doesn’t work as a result of there’s means too many angles for why Musk’s purchase of Twitter is essential. As a substitute, I’ll simply bullet checklist some particular angles that Avisionews dug into.
And eventually, I’ll simply remind you all that Twitter, in its earnings this week, mentioned that it has overcounted its customers over the previous 3 years. By 1.9 million accounts. Jeez. It’s a foul search for Twitter, but in addition unhealthy information for advertisers — a income stream that the platform may be very depending on. As Sarah Perez put it, “for an organization as depending on promoting revenues as Twitter presently is, it’s a marvel why they’d conform to a deal that places a free speech absolutist in cost.”
Picture Credit: Bryce Durbin / Avisionews
Okay, now let’s not discuss Elon Musk for the remainder of the e-newsletter
Sure, we’re at that time of the [insert high–profile news cycle] story. First, there are the leaks and scoops. Then there are the marginally hedged thought items. Then, there’s the Main Affirmation. Then, there are the straight-up savage threads and op-eds, sprinkled with extra leaks, extra scoops and key particulars. And eventually, the tales that need to present temporary respite from the aforementioned insanity. Let’s embrace this final stage!
The deal of the week, that will have snuck below your radar, is that Robinhood is shedding 9% of full-time workers.
Right here’s why it’s essential: Robinhood introduced its layoffs simply days earlier than Q1 2022 earnings, and after its seen its worth erode within the public markets. The transfer thus appears defensive, and the corporate’s try at proving that it’s en path to changing into a extra environment friendly and growth-oriented monetary establishment. Additionally in fintech information, PayPal is shuttering its San Francisco workplace.
Issues are getting tense:
Picture Credit: Orla (opens in a new window) / Getty Photographs
Throughout the week
Seen on Avisionews
How Lydia desires to make funds extra private and social
Does it scent like teen spirit, or teen chapter?
Airbnb commits to totally distant office: ‘Reside and work wherever’
AppDynamics founder’s Midas contact strikes once more as Harness valuation hits $3.7B
Snap broadcasts a mini drone known as Pixy
Seen on Avisionews+
How one can get into Y Combinator, in response to YC’s Dalton Caldwell
Please don’t YOLO your 401(ok) into shitcoins
Having some crypto in your 401(ok) is neither irrational nor exuberant
Why Latin America’s freight-forwarding alternative continues to be attracting capital
Charged with billions in capital, meet the 9 startups growing tomorrow’s batteries as we speak
Till subsequent time,
