It’s 9:30 a.m. on Saturday— the day earlier than the NFL’s 56th Tremendous Bowl. BetMGM, which is without doubt one of the seven sportsbooks at present authorized to supply sports activities betting in New York State, is actively soliciting bets on tomorrow’s sport, however the phrases “Tremendous Bowl” are nowhere to be discovered on the corporate’s app. As an alternative, BetMGM repeatedly describes the sport as “The Large Sport LVI.”
What on the planet is occurring right here?
The Nationwide Soccer League, not unsurprisingly, owns a number of emblems on the time period “Tremendous Bowl” that date again to 1968—the yr after the primary sport was performed. These emblems embrace, particularly, a trademark on the time period “Tremendous Bowl” in Class 41 for the sport itself, and one in category IC 009, which is the class that broadly talking contains pc apps.
Nonetheless, possessing trademark rights over a given mark doesn’t sometimes stop one other’s common use of a time period in a purely descriptive sense, similar to to reference a sporting occasion for informational functions. Moderately, trademark regulation at its core is primarily supposed to stop others from utilizing trademarked phrases in a fashion that creates client confusion as to the supply or identification of products or providers.
Thus, making a betting app referred to as “Tremendous Bowl” would nearly actually infringe upon the NFL’s mark and permit the NFL to sue for statutory damages. However merely inviting customers to return to a in a different way named sports activities betting web site to “wager on the winner of the NFL’s Tremendous Bowl LVI” would not going appear to create such confusion—a minimum of in lots of instances.
Furthermore, if a sports activities betting web site, along with utilizing its personal branded title, have been to incorporate a small disclaimer under using the phrase “Tremendous Bowl” to make clear its lack of affiliation with the NFL, the chance of trademark legal responsibility for utilizing the time period “Tremendous Bowl” would appear to grow to be even smaller nonetheless. That’s comparatively nicely settled below the precept of “nominative truthful use.”
So why, then, are so many massive on-line sports activities betting corporations immediately afraid of utilizing the time period “Tremendous Bowl,” even in a fashion that arguably enjoys authorized safety?
First, there would be the need to keep away from the chance of trademark litigation, as even defending an unsuccessful lawsuit prices a enterprise money and time.
A few of these corporations may additionally need to accomplice with the NFL on sure tasks down the highway. It’s by no means a good suggestion to anger a enterprise that you just hope in the future to work with as a accomplice. That is maybe simply widespread sense.
Lastly, there’s essentially the most regarding risk from a regulation and ethics perspective: that sure states, similar to New York, have elevated the facility of the NFL to implement their marks past the statutorily supposed stage of trademark safety by granting sports activities leagues monopolies over the sourcing of game-related information to on-line betting suppliers via so-called “sports data mandates.” Arguably, by requiring sports activities betting suppliers to make use of league-sanctioned information, these corporations are actually on the mercy of the league shutting down their information for purported non-compliance with league calls for.
Additional, leagues such because the NFL might now even try to put language in information licensing contracts to explicitly prohibit sure gaming operators from utilizing the time period “Tremendous Bowl”—creating the likelihood sure use by sports activities betting operators which may not violate trademark regulation may nonetheless quantity to a breach of a time period of their information providers contract.
After all, none of those three explanations appear to assist the broad notion that utilizing the time period “Tremendous Bowl” to explain a sports activities betting alternative would quantity to a trademark regulation violation. Nonetheless, it offers good context as to why a sports activities betting web site won’t wish to press its luck with using the time period—particularly the place their customers moderately know precisely what they imply once they write “The Large Sport LVI.”
____________
Marc Edelman (Marc@MarcEdelman.com) is a Professor of Legislation at Baruch School’s Zicklin College of Enterprise, Sports activities Ethics Director of the Robert Zicklin Middle on Company Integrity, and the founding father of Edelman Law. He’s the writer of “A Short Treatise on Sports Gambling” and “Monopolizing Sports Data.”
Nothing on this article is meant to function authorized recommendation. The writer has no authorized affiliation with any firm referenced by title on this article.