In late 2021, Trump tried to claim govt privilege over tons of of pages of paperwork referring to Jan. 6, regardless that he was not the manager. The precise govt, President Joe Biden, had declined to claim the privilege and maintain again the paperwork. Trump misplaced in district courtroom and appeals courtroom after which on the Supreme Court docket, the place Justices John Roberts, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett all agreed that Trump couldn’t block the nationwide archivist from turning over the paperwork to the choose committee.
Listen and subscribe to Daily Kos’ The Brief podcast with Markos Moulitsas and Kerry Eleveld
Ginni Thomas’ texts got here not in these paperwork, however in paperwork voluntarily turned over to the choose committee by Meadows within the temporary window earlier than he stopped cooperating. So it’s not that Clarence Thomas knew—for certain, at the very least—that his spouse would present up within the White Home paperwork Trump was looking for immediately to dam. However, whereas the Thomases declare to maintain his work as a Supreme Court docket justice and her work as a right-wing activist separate, additionally they describe themselves as “greatest mates” (curiously, a time period that reveals up in one in all Ginni’s texts to Meadows). It appears unlikely that she exchanged 29 texts with Mark Meadows and simply by no means talked about it to her greatest pal. Ginni additionally attended the Jan. 6 rally earlier than the storming of the Capitol, and he or she has ties to a few of the organizers of that occasion.
Even when Clarence didn’t oppose the rejection of Trump’s post-executive privilege declare as a result of he thought there may be paperwork referring to his spouse in these paperwork, he opposed it because the husband of somebody who was, at that second, cheering on Trump’s efforts to overturn the election, even providing (horrible) recommendation to Trump’s chief of workers about which attorneys’ efforts ought to be promoted. That’s a obvious battle of curiosity, but it surely’s simply one in all many circumstances during which Thomas didn’t recuse himself from issues during which his spouse was at the very least tangentially concerned. They’re a strolling ethics violation—or they might be if judicial ethics was one thing that utilized to conservative members of the Supreme Court docket.
Clarence Thomas has said that Ginni works “24/7 every single day in protection of liberty” and that they “are equally yoked, and we love being with one another as a result of we love the identical issues.” Being “equally yoked” is a reference to the biblical injunction towards being unequally yoked in a relationship with an unbeliever. An equally yoked workforce of oxen means they’re pulling in the identical route with the identical energy, getting the job achieved, whereas an unequally yoked workforce of oxen can be unable to take action. That’s an express assertion that he sees her work—which incorporates sitting on the board of a number of far-right teams—as linked to and aligned along with his personal.
Husbands and wives have to have the ability to have interaction in separate work and separate lives to be impartial of one another. However additionally they have to have the ability to acknowledge that typically their companions’ work has an impact on their very own, and to do the moral factor in stepping again in these moments. (I’m married to a daily outdated lawyer. On at the very least one event he has requested his employer to display screen him from a matter I’ve written about.) Clarence Thomas, against this, is not simply refusing to recuse himself the place his spouse is concerned, he’s telling us that his work and his spouse’s work are actively linked. That they share a challenge of remaking the nation’s legal guidelines, she from the surface and he from the within. That is deeply corrupt, and never simply the place Jan. 6 is anxious.
RELATED STORIES:
Nothing to see right here, says pro-Trump election lie advocate Ginni Thomas
If Republicans actually need to discuss Supreme Court docket justices recusing, this is the place to begin
