There received’t be a Democratic president’s nominee who will qualify as “extra reasonable” for Republicans. Interval. It’s not simply no Democratic president’s Supreme Court docket affirmation in presidential election years. It’s no Democratic president’s Supreme Court docket affirmation, ever, if the Republicans are in cost.
Listen and subscribe to Daily Kos’ The Brief podcast with Markos Moulitsas and Kerry Eleveld
When you wanted extra proof, Mitch McConnell provides it, “placing private and non-private stress on his Senate Republican colleagues to oppose President Biden’s nominee to the Supreme Court docket, regardless of the historic nature of her nomination to be the primary Black lady on the court docket,” The Hill stories. He made an “impassioned plea” for his colleagues to oppose Jackson at a Republican luncheon not too long ago, in accordance with at the very least one senator who was there.
“He sought recognition and stated, ‘I simply need to thank the members of the Judiciary Committee for the nice work they’ve executed in exposing this decide’s radical report, and particularly her report on youngster pornography instances are alarmingly excessive,’” the senator stated. “I feel the Democrats thought this is able to be a straightforward course of, affirmation, however it’s not going to be as a result of she’s a radical nominee, and I’d hope that each Republican would look severely at her report, which I feel is troubling.”
She’s a superbly certified nominee and not a radical. In any respect. As Republicans who aren’t working for president in 2024 and aren’t Mitch McConnell admit. Sen. Roy Blunt, (R-MO), for example: “I feel she’s actually going to be confirmed,” Blunt stated. “I feel it’ll be a excessive level for the nation to see her go on the court docket and take her distinctive perspective to the court docket. […] I received’t be supporting her, however I’ll be becoming a member of others in understanding the significance of this second.”
Or Sen. Thom Tillis (R-NC), who said:
“There isn’t any doubt that Choose Jackson is properly certified and her nomination as the primary black lady to the Supreme Court docket is historic. I used to be impressed together with her information, her composure, and her character throughout greater than 20 hours of questioning.”
By no means thoughts all that, she wouldn’t reply his query about whether or not she supported the court docket’s growth. That excuse is fully specious. Trump nominee Amy Coney Barrett additionally refused to reply the query. Pressed on that, Tillis argued, “It’s a really totally different query now than it was when Choose Barrett was right here.” Gee, I’m wondering why?
Nothing in these 20 hours of hearings that Republicans got here up with to oppose Jackson is credible, McConnell’s “gentle on crime” schtick included. It’s not actual. It’s politics. Al Cross, a professor of journalism on the College of Kentucky and a political commenter it the state nails it. “I can’t think about he actually believes her judgment in these youngster porn instances is a disqualifier to be on the Supreme Court docket, however as soon as it’s been such a difficulty in conservative media, then it takes on a lifetime of its personal,” he stated.
Any excuse that presents itself goes for use. Regardless of how offensive and damaging. Regardless of how appalling most of America finds it.
RELATED STORIES:
