The Kardashian–Jenner clan are not any strangers to controversy, and Kylie Jenner has not too long ago come beneath fireplace for her informal use of a non-public jet.
The Twitter account @CelebJets, which tracks celeb flights, posted Jenner’s plane route after she flew 17 minutes within the air to keep away from a mere 45-minute drive, belching carbon emissions over the skies of California as if there’s no tomorrow (and at this fee, there received’t be).
Twitter customers expressed fury at Jenner, for apparent causes, branding her a “local weather legal,” a label which appears totally applicable, contemplating the unhappy state of our planet.
Three days after the temporary, terribly wasteful flight, Jenner posted a black-and-white picture of herself and Travis Scott on Instagram, about to board one other non-public jet. Within the wake of criticism, Jenner seemed to be doubling down, together with a provocative caption within the submit: “you wanna take mine or yours ?”
The general public response to the post was simply as sturdy because the Twitter backlash; under the saccharine-soaked simpering and validation from fellow blue-check celebs and influencers, the overwhelming majority of responses to the submit identified the discrepancy between public consumption and the sickeningly wasteful methods of the rich.
Whereas anybody who pays the slightest little bit of consideration to the Kardashian–Jenners cannot declare to be stunned on the sight of them utilizing jets like Ubers, posting a photograph flaunting their wastefulness throughout yet one more summer season of scorching heatwaves, wildfires and damaged data is, on the very least, in poor style.
Jenner’s submit serves as a reminder that whereas the general public does their half to cut back emissions, the rich are spewing out air pollution as if they’re attempting to succeed in the excessive rating, making a joke out of any particular person, and even collective makes an attempt to cut back waste. What’s the purpose of retaining observe of carbon footprints when a single celeb’s footprint rivals that of Godzilla?
With every controversy, Jenner and her sisters appear to verify each unfavourable stereotype of the clueless wealthy child; Kendall Jenner not too long ago went viral for being unable to slice a cucumber, whereas Kim Kardashian sparked anger after carrying Marilyn Monroe’s gown to the 2022 Met Gala, seemingly stretching the material.
After all, the Kardashian–Jenners are hardly distinctive among the many wealthy and well-known; little doubt, there are rich people on the market who make the household look comparatively frugal, however have the sense to maintain quiet about it.
Even a celeb “environmentalist” like Leonardo DiCaprio is emitting way more air pollution than any member of the working class conceivably might, whereas the present crop of billionaires blasting phallic-shaped rockets into house are blowing “local weather criminals” like Jenner out of the sky.
The summers are solely getting hotter, and the rich do not appear desirous about cooling their jets.